i5-6442EQ vs Athlon 220GE
Aggregate performance score
Core i5-6442EQ outperforms Athlon 220GE by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1688 | 1680 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.08 | 0.40 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 7.55 | 10.68 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 1 June 2018 (6 years ago) | 12 October 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $250 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Athlon 220GE has 920% better value for money than i5-6442EQ.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 34 | 19 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 122 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.79 | 2.82 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.98 | 2.60 |
| Recency | 1 June 2018 | 12 October 2015 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Athlon 220GE has 14.6% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 2 years.
i5-6442EQ, on the other hand, has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and 40% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ.
Note that Athlon 220GE is a desktop processor while Core i5-6442EQ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 220GE and Core i5-6442EQ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
