Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX vs Athlon 200GE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1872 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.02 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 1 June 2018 (6 years ago) | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 12x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 99,780 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 350 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has 900% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 200GE and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
