Ryzen Threadripper 1900 vs Athlon 200GE
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1737 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.00 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 June 2018 (6 years ago) | 31 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2018 | 31 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has an age advantage of 9 months, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and Ryzen Threadripper 1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
