Embedded G-Series T56N vs Athlon 200GE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1971 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | AMD Embedded G-Series |
| Power efficiency | 2.81 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Bobcat |
| Release date | 1 June 2018 (7 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and Embedded G-Series T56N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.82 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | 16.5 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 451 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and Embedded G-Series T56N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Embedded G-Series T56N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Embedded G-Series T56N are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Embedded G-Series T56N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 10.67 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | AMD Radeon HD 6320 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Embedded G-Series T56N.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.60 | 0.33 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 18 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has 687.9% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
Embedded G-Series T56N, on the other hand, has 94.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 200GE and AMD Embedded G-Series T56N. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Embedded G-Series T56N is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
