EPYC 7532 vs Athlon 200GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 200GE
2018, $55
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.34
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
28.98
+1138%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Athlon 200GE by a whopping 1138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2041205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.826.11
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date1 June 2018 (7 years ago)19 February 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$55no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier3224
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 200GE 2.34
EPYC 7532 28.98
+1138%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 200GE 4106
Samples: 666
EPYC 7532 50765
+1136%
Samples: 47

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 200GE 915
EPYC 7532 1148
+25.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 200GE 1895
EPYC 7532 10001
+428%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.34 28.98
Recency 1 June 2018 19 February 2020
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

Athlon 200GE has 471% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 1138% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 200GE in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 872 votes

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.