Ryzen 3 8300G vs Athlon 1000

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.47
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data13.13
Architecture codenameThunderbird C (2000−2001)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date6 March 2000 (24 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,299$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm4 nm
Die size102 mm2137 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors22 million20,900 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAAM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2000 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm

Ryzen 3 8300G has an age advantage of 23 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 1000 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 1000
Athlon 1000
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 36 votes

Rate Athlon 1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 1000 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.