Celeron N4500 vs Athlon 1000
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2241 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird C (2000−2001) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | June 2000 (24 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 120 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | BGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N4500 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 1000 is a desktop processor while Celeron N4500 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 1000 and Celeron N4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
