Atom CE4130 vs Athlon 1000
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Thunderbird C (2000−2001) | Sodaville (2009) |
Release date | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) | 24 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,299 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 102 mm2 | 96 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 22 million | 47 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | A | Intel BGA 951 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 6 March 2000 | 24 September 2009 |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 7 Watt |
Atom CE4130 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 828.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 1000 is a desktop processor while Atom CE4130 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 1000 and Atom CE4130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.