EPYC 9654 vs Apple M5 Max

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.47
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data7.99
DesignerAppleAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release dateno data10 November 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of M5 Max and EPYC 9654: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data96
Threadsno data192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on M5 Max and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M5 Max and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M5 Max and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M5 Max and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M5 Max and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M5 Max 57361
Samples: 55
EPYC 9654 119259
+108%
Samples: 45

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Apple M5 Max and AMD EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M5 Max is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 19 votes

Rate M5 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1009 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M5 Max and EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.