Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs Apple M5 Max
Aggregate performance score
M5 Max outperforms M3 Max 16-Core by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 170 | 316 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.70 |
| Designer | Apple | Apple |
| Release date | 3 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M5 Max and M3 Max 16-Core: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 18 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.048 GHz | 2.748 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.61 GHz | 4.06 GHz |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 92000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M5 Max and M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 78 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.59 | 24.09 |
| Recency | 3 March 2026 | 30 October 2023 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 16 |
| Threads | 18 | 16 |
Apple M5 Max has a 39% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 13% more physical cores and 13% more threads.
The Apple M5 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
