Xeon W-10855M vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms Xeon W-10855M by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | 950 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Mobile workstation |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Comet Lake |
| Power efficiency | 82.78 | 16.68 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 13 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 45.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 16-core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.2 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@30Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.99 | 7.93 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 13 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 45 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 253% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 40.6% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10855M in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon W-10855M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon W-10855M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
