Xeon Platinum 8321HC vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 82.78 | no data |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 October 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 26 (Hexacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 52 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 35.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 88 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 16-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 October 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 26 |
| Threads | 12 | 52 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 88 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has an age advantage of 4 years, and 175% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8321HC, on the other hand, has 116.7% more physical cores and 333.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8321HC is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon Platinum 8321HC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
