Xeon 6315P vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 185 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 81.82 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $213 |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 163 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 16-core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6315P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 55 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 71.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Intel Xeon 6315P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon 6315P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
