Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking167not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency82.78no data
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)11 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1212
Base clock speed2.592 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 16-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 11 October 2019
Physical cores 12 6
Chip lithography 3 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 65 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 103.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 273 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.