Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4Intel Core 2 Duo
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date30 October 2024 (1 year ago)20 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$284

Detailed specifications

M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.592 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L2 cache4 MB6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography3 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)4 MB17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 16-core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 20 August 2008
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has an age advantage of 16 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300
Core 2 Duo SL9300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 121 votes

Rate M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M4 Pro (12 cores) and Core 2 Duo SL9300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.