Atom C3508 vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 2377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | 2392 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 82.78 | 9.51 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | no data | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 11.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4: 1866 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.871 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 16-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 8 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 8 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.99 | 1.13 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 15 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 11 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 2377% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
Atom C3508, on the other hand, has 190.9% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3508 in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
