A10 PRO-7800B vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Aggregate performance score
M4 Pro (12 cores) outperforms A10 PRO-7800B by a whopping 888% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 372 | 2162 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.11 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | no data | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 31 July 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4096 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 245 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,411 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| Out-of-band client management | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
| HSA | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3-2133 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 16-core GPU | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 512 |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and A10 PRO-7800B.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.58 | 1.88 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 31 July 2014 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 65 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has a 888.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10 PRO-7800B in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a notebook processor while A10 PRO-7800B is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
