Xeon Silver 4214R vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Xeon Silver 4214R by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | 681 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 25.69 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Xeon Silver |
| Power efficiency | 29.41 | 10.88 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 24 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $705 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 79 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.97 | 11.50 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 24 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 100 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 143.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Silver 4214R, on the other hand, has 50% more threads.
The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214R in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4214R is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Silver 4214R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
