Xeon Phi 7210F vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.41 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 230 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 64 |
| Threads | 16 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 230 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 8 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 155.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7210F, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7210F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon Phi 7210F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
