Xeon D-1612 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking168not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4Intel Xeon D
Power efficiency29.41no data
Architecture codenameno dataBroadwell (2015−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt22 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
AMTno dataSPS 3.0
Quiet Systemno data-

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612.

PCIe versionno data2.0/3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 2 April 2019
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 22 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon D-1612, on the other hand, has 309.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1612 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon D-1612, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon D-1612
Xeon D-1612

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1612 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon D-1612, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.