Xeon 6756E vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.43 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 3 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $8,428 |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 128 |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | no data | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 80 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 128 |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 225 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 4 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6756E, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon 6756E is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon 6756E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
