Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Ryzen Embedded V3C48 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 167 | 614 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.43 | 26.70 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Rembrandt (2022) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 27 September 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.79 | 12.61 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 27 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 45 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 120.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.
The M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Embedded V3C48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
