Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97
+143%
Ryzen 7 4800HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.53

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Ryzen 7 4800HS by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking168679
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency29.4131.18
Architecture codenameno dataRenoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data29
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP6
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.97 11.53
Recency 30 October 2024 6 January 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 142.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 4800HS, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 4800HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 7 4800HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Ryzen 7 4800HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 265 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Ryzen 7 4800HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.