EPYC Embedded 3251 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 29.41 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $315 |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 25 |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 50 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 50 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC Embedded 3251, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3251 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC Embedded 3251, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
