i9-10800F vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.41 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 30 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 65 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 4 years, 60% more physical cores, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
i9-10800F, on the other hand, has 25% more threads, and 38.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Core i9-10800F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Core i9-10800F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
