Core 2 Solo SL3400 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 251 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.76 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and Core 2 Solo SL3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Core 2 Solo SL3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Core 2 Solo SL3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
M4 Max (16 cores) and Core 2 Solo SL3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Core 2 Solo SL3400 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 16 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 17 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 15 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Solo SL3400, on the other hand, has 429.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Intel Core 2 Solo SL3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
