Athlon 300U vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97
+1051%
Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.43

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Athlon 300U by a whopping 1051% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1681767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Athlon
Power efficiency29.4115.33
Architecture codenameno dataRaven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFP5
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.97 2.43
Recency 30 October 2024 6 January 2019
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 1051% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 300U, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 300U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 460 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.