A12-9800E vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms A12-9800E by a whopping 1177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 168 | 1845 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.90 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.41 | 5.92 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $105 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 40-core GPU | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.97 | 2.19 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 27 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 1177.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.
A12-9800E, on the other hand, has 157.1% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9800E in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while A12-9800E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A12-9800E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
