EPYC 9334 vs Apple M4 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9334 outperforms M4 Max 16-Core by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 289 | 121 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.86 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.55 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,990 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M4 Max 16-Core and EPYC 9334: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 27 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 72 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max 16-Core and EPYC 9334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max 16-Core and EPYC 9334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max 16-Core and EPYC 9334 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max 16-Core and EPYC 9334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max 16-Core and EPYC 9334.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.65 | 38.30 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 32 |
| Threads | 16 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
Apple M4 Max 16-Core has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC 9334, on the other hand, has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The AMD EPYC 9334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max 16-Core in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while EPYC 9334 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
