Xeon 6511P vs Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6511P outperforms M4 Max (14 cores) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 304 | 193 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 38.18 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.79 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 30 November 2024 (1 year ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $815 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 72 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 83 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 32-core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and Xeon 6511P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 136 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.85 | 29.07 |
| Recency | 30 November 2024 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 16 |
| Threads | 14 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 150 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) has 3650% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6511P, on the other hand, has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and 14.3% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6511P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (14 cores) in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon 6511P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
