EPYC 4565P vs Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms EPYC 4565P by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 67 | 80 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 70.89 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 51.26 | 22.54 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Grado (2025) |
| Release date | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) | 13 May 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (14 cores) and EPYC 4565P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (14 cores) and EPYC 4565P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and EPYC 4565P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and EPYC 4565P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and EPYC 4565P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 32-core GPU | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (14 cores) and EPYC 4565P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 42.51 | 39.73 |
| Recency | 30 November 2024 | 13 May 2025 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 16 |
| Threads | 14 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 170 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 112.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4565P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 14.3% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Max (14 cores) and AMD EPYC 4565P.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook processor while EPYC 4565P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
