Xeon W-3235 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 (10 cores)
2024
10 cores / 10 threads, 40 Watt
21.02
+32.3%
Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
15.89

Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms Xeon W-3235 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking309492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.61
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M4Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency50.698.52
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataCascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date7 May 2024 (1 year ago)3 June 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,398

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1024
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data33
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache4 MB12 MB
L3 cacheno data19.25 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Number of transistors28 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 10-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.02 15.89
Recency 7 May 2024 3 June 2019
Physical cores 10 12
Threads 10 24
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 180 Watt

Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3235, on the other hand, has 20% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

The Apple M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-3235 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3235 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 (10 cores)
M4 (10 cores)
Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 152 votes

Rate M4 (10 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M4 (10 cores) and Xeon W-3235, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.