Xeon Gold 5320H vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5320H outperforms M4 (10 cores) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 623 | 393 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.86 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 6 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 27.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 4 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon Gold 5320H.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.45 | 17.95 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 20 |
| Threads | 10 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 150 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has an age advantage of 3 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 3650% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5320H, on the other hand, has a 33.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5320H is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 (10 cores) in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5320H is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
