Xeon E5-2690 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms Xeon E5-2690 by a whopping 259% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 241 | 1094 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.93 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 52.16 | 4.30 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $397 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 20480 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 435 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 2,270 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
Security technologies
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.2 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.06 | 6.14 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 6 March 2012 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 8 |
| Threads | 10 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 135 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 259.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 25% more physical cores, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 237.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2690, on the other hand, has 60% more threads.
The M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2690 in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2690 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E5-2690, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
