Xeon E3-1270 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms Xeon E3-1270 by a whopping 555% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 241 | 1578 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.23 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 52.19 | 3.98 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 3 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $369 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 216 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 1,160 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | LGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FDI | no data | - |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.89 | 3.34 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 3 April 2011 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 80 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 555.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
The M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1270 in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1270 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon E3-1270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
