Pentium III 800 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 604 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.34 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Coppermine T (2000) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (1 year ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Pentium III 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 80 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 44 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Pentium III 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 38 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 1 |
| Threads | 10 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 38 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium III 800, on the other hand, has 5.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Intel Pentium III 800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a notebook processor while Pentium III 800 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
