FX-6300 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 245 | 1750 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 59 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.64 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 52.22 | 2.59 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $132 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8192 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1866 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.92 | 2.58 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 23 October 2012 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 10 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 95 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 749.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 137.5% lower power consumption.
The M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and FX-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
