FX-4100 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms FX-4100 by a whopping 1194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 292 | 2214 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 50.60 | 1.65 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 12 October 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8192 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-4100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and FX-4100.
| PCIe version | no data | n/a |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.09 | 1.63 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 12 October 2011 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 10 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 95 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 1193.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 137.5% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD FX-4100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a notebook processor while FX-4100 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
