i5-8500 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 (10 cores)
2024
10 cores / 10 threads, 40 Watt
22.07
+267%
Core i5-8500
2018
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.01

Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms Core i5-8500 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2391107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.79
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesApple Apple M4Intel Core i5
Power efficiency52.228.75
Architecture codenameno dataCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)
Release date7 May 2024 (less than a year ago)14 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$202

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads106
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors28 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 10-core GPUIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.07 6.01
Recency 7 May 2024 14 February 2018
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 10 6
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 65 Watt

Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 267.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-8500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Core i5-8500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 (10 cores)
M4 (10 cores)
Intel Core i5-8500
Core i5-8500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 21 vote

Rate M4 (10 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 879 votes

Rate Core i5-8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 (10 cores) or Core i5-8500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.