Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
M4 (10 cores) outperforms Core 2 Duo SU7300 by a whopping 4116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 618 | 3339 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Core 2 Duo SU7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 10 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Core 2 Duo SU7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core 2 Duo SU7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
M4 (10 cores) and Core 2 Duo SU7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Core 2 Duo SU7300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.49 | 0.32 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 1 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 10 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 10 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 4115.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
