Celeron G1101 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 (10 cores)
2024
10 cores / 10 threads, 40 Watt
13.58
+2090%

M4 (10 cores) outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 2090% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5902977
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.97
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple Apple M4no data
Power efficiency14.350.36
DesignerAppleIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameno dataClarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date7 May 2024 (1 year ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads102
Base clock speedno data2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz0.27 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Number of transistors28 Million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 10-core GPUIntel HD

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data1

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M4 (10 cores) 13.58
+2090%
Celeron G1101 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M4 (10 cores) 23872
+2098%
Samples: 1638
Celeron G1101 1086
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.58 0.62
Recency 7 May 2024 7 January 2010
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 10 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 73 Watt

Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 2090.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 82.5% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron G1101 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a notebook processor while Celeron G1101 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 (10 cores)
M4 (10 cores)
Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 245 votes

Rate M4 (10 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M4 (10 cores) and Celeron G1101, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.