Athlon 900 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 617 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (1 year ago) | 6 March 2000 (25 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $899 |
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Athlon 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 102 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 22 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Athlon 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 60 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Athlon 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 6 March 2000 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 1 |
| Threads | 10 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 60 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has an age advantage of 24 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 5900% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M4 (10 cores) and AMD Athlon 900. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a notebook processor while Athlon 900 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
