MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Apple M3 Pro 12-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 27 Watt
16.12
+714%
MediaTek Kompanio 520
8 cores / 8 threads
1.98

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 520 by a whopping 714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4161943
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3MediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiency56.50no data
Architecture codenameno data2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.748 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2 GHz
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm
Number of transistors37000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)27 Wattno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPUno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 16.12
+714%
MediaTek Kompanio 520 1.98

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 15298
+899%
MediaTek Kompanio 520 1532

WebXPRT 3

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 427
+253%
MediaTek Kompanio 520 121

CrossMark Overall

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 1977
+461%
MediaTek Kompanio 520 353

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.12 1.98
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core has a 714.1% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
M3 Pro 12-Core
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 102 votes

Rate Apple M3 Pro 12-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Pro 12-Core or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.