A10-6800K vs Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
Aggregate performance score
M3 Pro 12-Core outperforms A10-6800K by a whopping 652% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 640 | 2241 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.35 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M3 | AMD A-Series (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 21.39 | 0.77 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | no data | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 June 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $142 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 74 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-2133 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | no data | 384 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Pro 12-Core and A10-6800K.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.69 | 1.82 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 1 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 100 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core has a 652% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 967% more advanced lithography process, and 270% lower power consumption.
The Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A10-6800K in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is a notebook processor while A10-6800K is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
