Xeon E5-2698A V3 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
Primary details
Comparing M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 443 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 54.68 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 18 November 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 11 (Undeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 11 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 40 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | no data | 356 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 88 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | 2,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | 2011-3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2133 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 18 November 2014 |
| Physical cores | 11 | 16 |
| Threads | 11 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 165 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has an age advantage of 8 years, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 511.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2698A V3, on the other hand, has 45.5% more physical cores and 190.9% more threads.
We couldn't decide between M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2698A V3 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-2698A V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
