Xeon E5-1410 v2 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2023
11 cores / 11 threads, 27 Watt
15.87
+332%
Xeon E5-1410 v2
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.67

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core outperforms Xeon E5-1410 v2 by a whopping 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4391498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency54.594.26
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)9 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores11 (Undeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads118
Base clock speed2.748 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data10 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors37000 Million1,860 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.65-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1356
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 15.87
+332%
Xeon E5-1410 v2 3.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core 24745
+333%
Xeon E5-1410 v2 5715

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.87 3.67
Recency 30 October 2023 9 January 2014
Physical cores 11 4
Threads 11 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 80 Watt

Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has a 332.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 175% more physical cores and 37.5% more threads, a 633.3% more advanced lithography process, and 196.3% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1410 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-1410 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Xeon E5-1410 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
Xeon E5-1410 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 93 votes

Rate Apple M3 Pro 11-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1410 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Pro 11-Core or Xeon E5-1410 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.