Pentium Dual-Core E2210 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
Primary details
Comparing Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 426 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 1 June 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 11 (Undeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 11 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 82 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 1 June 2009 |
| Physical cores | 11 | 2 |
| Threads | 11 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 65 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has an age advantage of 14 years, 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 140.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook processor while Pentium Dual-Core E2210 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and Pentium Dual-Core E2210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
