Opteron 240 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 607 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.21 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) | April 2003 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M3 Pro 11-Core and Opteron 240: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 11 (Undeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 11 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Pro 11-Core and Opteron 240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 85 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 11 | 1 |
| Threads | 11 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 85 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has 1000% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, a 4233% more advanced lithography process, and 215% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Pro 11-Core and AMD Opteron 240. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook processor while Opteron 240 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
