Xeon Gold 5315Y vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.86
+97.3%
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
13.11

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Xeon Gold 5315Y by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking194578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency31.388.86
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.748 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataFCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.86
+97.3%
Xeon Gold 5315Y 13.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41076
+97.3%
Xeon Gold 5315Y 20820

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.86 13.11
Recency 30 October 2023 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 140 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 97.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 79.5% lower power consumption.

The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5315Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5315Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon Gold 5315Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5315Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or Xeon Gold 5315Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.