Xeon E6540 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 285 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.76 | no data |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E6540: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 2.27 GHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 18 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E6540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA1567 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E6540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E6540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E6540 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 1 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 105 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has an age advantage of 13 years, 167% more physical cores and 33% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 35% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Intel Xeon E6540. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon E6540 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
